<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mass Effect: Andromeda</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.game-over.com/content/2017/03/mass-effect-andromeda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.game-over.com/content/2017/03/mass-effect-andromeda/</link>
	<description>Game Over Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 17:03:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>https://www.game-over.com/content/2017/03/mass-effect-andromeda/#comment-1291210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.game-over.com/content/?p=35329#comment-1291210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good English. Good English. Proper English.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good English. Good English. Proper English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>https://www.game-over.com/content/2017/03/mass-effect-andromeda/#comment-1291197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 01:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.game-over.com/content/?p=35329#comment-1291197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Appreciate your review, but can I give you some tips?

1) &quot;So it wouldn’t be an understatement to say...&quot;
So many people, including professionals on big name network new shows and newspapers ,make this gross mistake.  Folk, if you don&#039;t know the proper use of &quot;understate&quot; vs. &quot;overstate&quot; DON&#039;T USE IT!
For example: &quot;it woudn&#039;t be an understatement to say he was 60 feet tall&quot;.  No, it isn&#039;t.  Because he can be 5 ft tall and the statement is correct.  So, what are you trying to say? I think you meant &quot;overstatement&quot;.

2) &quot;however, in the 600 years it took the colony ships to reach them, the planets have suffered some environmental cataclysm&quot;

I haven&#039;t played the game, so maybe this is what Bioware intended (and reveals?). Maybe the Kett invaded in last 600 (or 6?) years...
...But the physics is really this: Andromeda is 2.5M light years away.  If they used any normal technology to examine these golden worlds, they are looking 2.5M years in the past.  So it wouldn&#039;t be only the last 600 years where some cataclysm may have occurred.
And they (Initiative/Bioware) should have known that before setting off.  Hey, 2.5M years isn&#039;t enough to change 7 planets&#039; geologies.  But imagine if scopes were trained on Earth 2.5M years back so some intrepid explorers decided to come to this world without sentient life?
So this is my beef: the whole game is based on a crazy concept: Spend a kabillion $ to send people on a crap shoot based on potentially viable planets 2.5M years ago. If at least they explain it as a hedge against the Reapers, well maybe that gives it a *little* viability.

3) Multiplayer: A LOT of people love ME3&#039;s horde-mode MP. If you look it up, you&#039;ll find the majority of professional reviews more or less say &quot;surprisingly fun/satisfying/excellent MP&quot;.  And many testimonials from players along the lines of &quot;I didn&#039;t plan to try MP, but now I&#039;m hooked&quot;.  Having said that, I&#039;m reading now that there are some serious issues with it, such that those same ME3 MP&#039;rs are waiting for fixes.
I think your criticism is fine, it&#039;s your opinion.  But, at least to many, the issue is it is buggy, not the design intent (to recreate the very successful ME3 MP which is still active 5 years later).

4) &quot;I’m not particularly adverse to more of the same (a quote so good, it should definitely be on the game box somewhere)&quot;
Well, if they do quote it, request they change it to &quot;averse&quot;.  Look it up.

Yeah, some snark here.  But if you are going to publish, I suggest working on the bugs (apparently, just like Bioware needs to).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciate your review, but can I give you some tips?</p>
<p>1) &#8220;So it wouldn’t be an understatement to say&#8230;&#8221;<br />
So many people, including professionals on big name network new shows and newspapers ,make this gross mistake.  Folk, if you don&#8217;t know the proper use of &#8220;understate&#8221; vs. &#8220;overstate&#8221; DON&#8217;T USE IT!<br />
For example: &#8220;it woudn&#8217;t be an understatement to say he was 60 feet tall&#8221;.  No, it isn&#8217;t.  Because he can be 5 ft tall and the statement is correct.  So, what are you trying to say? I think you meant &#8220;overstatement&#8221;.</p>
<p>2) &#8220;however, in the 600 years it took the colony ships to reach them, the planets have suffered some environmental cataclysm&#8221;</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t played the game, so maybe this is what Bioware intended (and reveals?). Maybe the Kett invaded in last 600 (or 6?) years&#8230;<br />
&#8230;But the physics is really this: Andromeda is 2.5M light years away.  If they used any normal technology to examine these golden worlds, they are looking 2.5M years in the past.  So it wouldn&#8217;t be only the last 600 years where some cataclysm may have occurred.<br />
And they (Initiative/Bioware) should have known that before setting off.  Hey, 2.5M years isn&#8217;t enough to change 7 planets&#8217; geologies.  But imagine if scopes were trained on Earth 2.5M years back so some intrepid explorers decided to come to this world without sentient life?<br />
So this is my beef: the whole game is based on a crazy concept: Spend a kabillion $ to send people on a crap shoot based on potentially viable planets 2.5M years ago. If at least they explain it as a hedge against the Reapers, well maybe that gives it a *little* viability.</p>
<p>3) Multiplayer: A LOT of people love ME3&#8217;s horde-mode MP. If you look it up, you&#8217;ll find the majority of professional reviews more or less say &#8220;surprisingly fun/satisfying/excellent MP&#8221;.  And many testimonials from players along the lines of &#8220;I didn&#8217;t plan to try MP, but now I&#8217;m hooked&#8221;.  Having said that, I&#8217;m reading now that there are some serious issues with it, such that those same ME3 MP&#8217;rs are waiting for fixes.<br />
I think your criticism is fine, it&#8217;s your opinion.  But, at least to many, the issue is it is buggy, not the design intent (to recreate the very successful ME3 MP which is still active 5 years later).</p>
<p>4) &#8220;I’m not particularly adverse to more of the same (a quote so good, it should definitely be on the game box somewhere)&#8221;<br />
Well, if they do quote it, request they change it to &#8220;averse&#8221;.  Look it up.</p>
<p>Yeah, some snark here.  But if you are going to publish, I suggest working on the bugs (apparently, just like Bioware needs to).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
