Game Over Online ~ Star Trek: Birth of the Federation

GameOver Game Reviews - Star Trek: Birth of the Federation (c) Microprose, Reviewed by - Jove

Game & Publisher Star Trek: Birth of the Federation (c) Microprose
System Requirements Pentium 133, 32MB Ram, 4x CD-ROM
Overall Rating 71%
Date Published Friday, June 11th, 1999 at 07:20 PM

Divider Left By: Jove Divider Right

The concept for Birth of the Federation is simple and appealing to anyone interested in Star Trek or space strategy. Essentially you are given control of one of the five major empires of the Star Trek universe: The United Federation of Planets, The Cardasian Union, The Klingon Empire, The Romulan Star Empire and The Ferengi Alliance. In addition to these major races there are a slew of minor races, which are not directly controlled by the player, but are part of the interactive environment. Enticing as the concept may sound, the gameplay has many design problems and a lot of the combat sub-mode is poorly implemented. In addition, repetitive gameplay and bland graphics hamper an otherwise decent game.

The classiest graphical creation in Birth of the Federation is the slickly designed interface, which is unique to each race but not too convoluted to hamper game control. Each unique interface is nicely coloured and represents the style of the race as seen on the television show, but all offer the identical commands and options. The remainder of the graphics seemed to have suffered from an apathetic art department in that they offer nothing new from Master of Orion II (a 4 year old game) and often detract from gameplay by having non-distinguishable units in combat. The primary game screen is very similar to that of Master of Orion II where you have a main screen showing the star map, and a few side panels showing statistics and offering options for your empire. Opening the system colonization screen presents an almost entirely textual screen showing a myriad of information about that particular colony, while also allowing the player to allocate labor and queue production. "Uneventful" graphics complements the usually uneventful gameplay so don't expect much.

Combat consists of "3D" models of the ships fighting it out in a somewhat 3d black plane. Most of the time however the ships are so small that you can't see any detail on them and their weapons look like nothing more than a coloured line. It is possible to change camera angles, but every time I tried this it defaulted back to the original camera after each round, which became so incredibly annoying that I just gave up the effort. There are occasions when combat is enjoyable and I admit at a sense of satisfaction in out maneuvering a superior fleet causing a great upset battle and shifting the power in the galaxy, to me of course. The combat sub-game is cursed by a lack of options and a horrible camera view, which, in the long run makes combat dull.

The minor races that make an appearance in Birth of the Federation are one of the better-implemented parts of the game. You can conduct diplomacy with them allowing for various treaties and agreements to be made and of course, broken. It is even possible for some of these races to become a member of your empire thus giving you control over their resources. Of course, if you are feeling a tad more hostile you can always subjugate the race, but this often results in constant revolts and future problems in your empire. Other diplomatic possibilities include affiliation, trade and science treaties. While this is all pretty much standard diplomatic fare in a strategy game, the addition of many different kinds of personalities (each minor race is considerably different) is fresh and adds a lot to the game. Unfortunately the diplomatic model is pretty basic and the AI lacks a lot of forethought and logic that should be present in a game of 1999.

The research tree is abysmal. Technologies are given names such as Hydroponics I, Hydroponics II, Engines I, Engines II etc. etc. This is simply pathetic and should have never passed beta testing, EVER. Research is always one of the most enjoyable aspects of a strategy game and discovering the new cool technology first is always one of the player's primary goals and greatest satisfactions. But with names such as the aforementioned, I couldn't care less if I got it first or second or last. It's also just way too easy to research and I found the default settings worked perfectly in all situations thus reducing any management on my part to 0, along with the enjoyment of researching. To make this situation worse, there are barely any unique buildings to build as most suffer the same naming curse of the technology tree: Factory I, Factory II, Factory III etc. etc. I also had to play on the impossible in order for my enemies to actually have a technology lead over me, but I still found that the default settings were the best, as often you need to progress one level in each tech to get an upgraded building or ship. Research is the single most pathetic aspect of Birth of the Federation, and really its primary downfall.

If research is Birth of the Federation's primary downfall then the absence of ship design and personalities is its second. I was extremely ticked off when I found out I couldn't design ships but that I had to use the stupid pre-designed ships called command I, Command II, Strike I, Strike II etc., etc. as per usual. I couldn't even name the bloody things. In addition to this there are no personalities to act as leaders as in Master of Orion 2. For instance you can't have captain Picard controlling the enterprise and giving it big bonuses, nor can you have Gauron (or however you spell that guy's name) commanding a Klingon battle cruiser. The potential for this with the Star Trek license was immense, but it was completely unused. Thus I give two enthusiastic extensions of the middle finger to the designers for fucking with the research and ship design so many people expected.

The cliché would be to say that Birth of the Federation only "shines" when I begin to discuss it's sound, but gaming clichés have ruined the gaming press so I'll refrain from using it (Didn't think I could say something without saying it? Think again.). I was impressed with the computer voices, which were customized for each race and found the general beeps and clicks more appealing than usual. Weapon fire and ship movement is essentially identical to the TV shows, so there isn't much to complain about. While Birth of the Federation only offered one piece per race, its music created an environment synonymous with each race that I found to be a great complement to the interface and speech.

Eh, ah, er, um, well, I don't know. And that concludes my thoughts on multiplayer in Birth of the Federation. Not much to say here, the configuration is identical to the single player game (galaxy size, shape and minor race frequency). Games are turn based, so they are slow and kind of boring and not even close to as fun as an RTS or FPS multiplayer.

Birth of the Federation's greatest achievement is creating an environment in which the player feels he is actually controlling a specific empire from the Star Trek universe. The downfall is the basic gameplay model, abysmal customizability options and the lack of good ship-to-ship combat. While by all means not an awful game, Birth of the Federation lacks the innovation and dedication necessary for a great game in the day where money has long been the prime motivator and games flow into the market like fruit from the Horn of Plenty.


See the Game Over Online Rating System






Screen Shots
Screen Shot
Screen Shot
Screen Shot
Screen Shot
Screen Shot
Screen Shot
Screen Shot
Screen Shot

Back to Game Over Online